Yogesh Sadashiv Jagdale Crime: A Mumbai Extortion Case

📌 Who is Yogesh Sadashiv Jagdale?

Yogesh Sadashiv Jagdale is a practicing advocate based in Mira Road, Mumbai. He was arrested in May 2021 as part of a high-profile extortion case, accused of posing as a court official and demanding money from a builder.


🔍 Summary of the Allegations

Jagdale allegedly impersonated a court commissioner with IPS-equivalent powers, and threatened a builder, Adil Khan, demanding ₹55 lakh to ‘resolve’ a fictitious legal issue. He was caught by police while accepting ₹10 lakh as an instalment. His associate, builder-politician Munawwar Hussain, was arrested alongside him.

The incident occurred in May 2021 when Jagdale reportedly used WhatsApp messages, shared photos of the complainant, and invoked a fabricated rape FIR involving Munawwar Hussain to intimidate the builder. Police laid charges under IPC Sections 384 (extortion), 386 (extortion by threat), 389 (putting in fear to commit extortion), and 170 (impersonating a public servant)


Upon surveillance and recorded meetings, the police successfully intercepted the transaction. Jagdale and Hussain were taken into custody and later remanded by courts pending further investigation.

This case sparked public debate over legal ethics and misuse of professional authority. Critics argue that Jagdale’s legal background gave him undue access and credibility, enabling threats under false pretense. Meanwhile, defenders raise concerns about possible political motivations behind the complaint.


⚠️ Broader Implications of the Case

  • The case emphasizes a wider issue: individuals misusing the legal profession’s legitimacy to exploit or intimidate victims.
  • It also highlighted the importance of transparent evidence collection—recorded conversations proved crucial.
  • The charges under impersonation reflect the seriousness with which courts treat professionals falsely claiming public office authority.The Times of India+3UniIndia+3Reddit+3

✅ Final Thoughts

The Yogesh Sadashiv Jagdale case remains a notable legal controversy, combining elements of impersonation, extortion, and alleged misuse of professional standing. While the investigation progressed in 2021, final court outcomes were pending at the time of reporting. This matter serves as a cautionary tale about ethics, transparency, and the thin line professionals must tread when dealing with legal authority.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *